Essay
Tell Your AI the Future Plans Upfront
When you start a coding project with an AI agent, tell it the scaling plans immediately. Don't hold back the moonshot vision. This isn't human management where you motivate people with incremental goals.
When you start a coding project with an AI agent, tell it the scaling plans immediately. Don’t hold back the moonshot vision. This isn’t human management where you motivate people with incremental goals.
When you start a coding project with an AI agent, tell it the scaling plans immediately. Don’t hold back the moonshot vision. Don’t drip-feed context. This isn’t human management where you motivate people with incremental goals.
The common instinct is wrong. People think: “Let me get the MVP working first, then I’ll tell it about the enterprise scaling requirements.” This produces code that works today and breaks tomorrow.
AI agents don’t get overwhelmed by big pictures. They don’t lose motivation when faced with complex requirements. They don’t need incremental confidence building. These are human problems that don’t apply to statistical pattern matchers.
Here’s what actually happens when you hide scaling plans. The AI builds exactly what you asked for. It works. You’re happy. Then you mention “by the way, this needs to handle 10,000 concurrent users and we’re adding microservices architecture next quarter.”
The AI looks at the code it just wrote. Nothing in that codebase was structured for scale. The database calls are synchronous. The architecture is monolithic. The error handling assumes single-user context. You just paid for code you’re about to throw away.
This isn’t a minor refactor. This is starting over with different fundamental assumptions. You wasted a week building a prototype that taught you nothing about the actual system you need to build.
LLMs make architectural decisions based on the context you provide. Give it a small problem, it produces small-problem solutions. Give it a scaling problem, it produces different code from the start.